History, forgivennes and
power
History is subject to a
perrenial double reading. As an agent of understanding leading to forgiveness
and an agent of understanding leading to power. The two are contradictory and
mutually exclusive, because forgiveness allowance, absorbtion, a toleration of
illness. Forgiveness is a palliative, power is a health. Power is dangerous
unless it encompasses everything.
History describes a landscape
of obstacles and it describes journeys over that landcape. The next stage is
for history to become the bed of politics. History becomes politicised. It
imagines reasons for the way things happen and why they happened that way. From
the manure of these reasons politics grows into a system of relative
priorities. There are two basic options: One can use the description to
understand what happened allow understanding to become an act of forgiveness.
This way one can be tolerant towards the disbalances that have arisen out of
the habit of that history. Depending on the scale of the disbalance such an
attitude can lead to a benign tolerance or foolhardy tolerance. Or one can use
the history not to excuse the failure of people on account of the height of the
obstacles but formulate collective and inclusive strategies of mutual
cooperation to scale the obstacles and overcome them. That is a large power.
And as to the mistakes of the past?
“What’s compressed in 300
years of
A quotation from an interview
with Maya Jaggi in 1997.